Yes, the many faces of cost estimating in construction…

Construction cost estimating can take many forms and shapes. I am writing this article for those unfamiliar with the conceptual cost estimating field. It is a field that is worthwhile exploring. It gives a cost estimator more exposure to the field, adds more career development and, increases the chances of finding employment through slow economic times (more options). If you are a seasoned cost estimator, versed in all aspects of cost estimating, you might not find anything new in this post. I will still encourage you to read it if you have the time and desire to do so of course. Your comments would be very valuable to all of us.

Most cost estimators I know are in the field of detail cost estimating, in other words, they do cost estimating on firm costs. They work for either general contractors or trade/specialty contractors. Their top of the list challenge on each project is to produce a cost estimate that is feasible and competitive at the same time. For this, they need to know all the intimate details of the project: scope, constructability, timeline, labor productivity, crew sizes, equipment productivity, temporary requirements, general conditions, understand the competition, etc. In other words, a cost estimator who specializes in detail cost estimating over time develops a very good sense of how much “things” cost in construction. Where is all this going you might wonder?

Let me explain. Until a few years back, my career background as a cost estimator was entirely based on work done on projects issued for tender. So “detail” was the word of the day, every day. That was until I started working for my first engineering design client. I never knew what was going on on the other side of the fence. I was always on the contractor’s side of the business where the predominant cost estimating methodology is bottom-up, first principles, detail based cost estimates.

Enter the conceptual cost estimating space! For a cost estimator with an extensive background in detail cost estimating, I found this specialty of cost estimating fascinating. For those unfamiliar with conceptual cost estimating, this is the field of developing cost estimates based on various levels of design development. It can be based on as little as 1% to 5% design, going all the way up to 100%. The lower the design definition, the more conceptual cost estimating is used to develop the cost estimates. As the design definition increases, a combination of conceptual and detailed cost estimating is used, ending with pure detail cost estimating methodology for design definition 65% and higher, depending on the type of the project.

To make the move from detail cost estimating to conceptual cost estimating, you will most likely go through a learning curve. I know I did. It was mostly around methodologies, terminology and finding appropriate resources. What you will find very interesting is that your knowledge is the most valuable resource. On the many projects I worked on, from order of magnitude to detailed cost estimate, I had the ability to develop costs which were within 5% of market validation prices. What helped me achieve such a great result? My experience in contractor’s detailed cost estimating. I will give you an example.

A while back, one client I was working for asked me if I could determine the duration of a project based on a cost estimate. The project was in pre-feasibility phase, and the client had a cost estimate, developed by another party. The design definition at the basis of the cost estimate was 50% at the most. The cost estimate was developed using unit prices applied to item quantity in a work breakdown structure, for the most part to the complex activity level. What was needed was to determine the probable duration of the project.

It was something I did not do before, but it was an interesting assignment. Having a background in detail cost estimating helped. Understanding crew make-up, production rates, indirect costs and project mark-up based on an assumed project delivery method is a good start. This is how I did it (remember this was a pre-feasibility study. Therefore, the target accuracy was -30%/+40%):

Confused? Try doing it on a cost estimate you have and see how the results measure up!

To conclude, this article was an example, out of many I could offer, where a cost estimator with extensive experience in detailed cost estimating can solve a conceptual cost estimating question.

For those who are not familiar with the field of conceptual cost estimating, I would encourage you to research it. It could offer you versatility and career advancement. It can open the doors to more job opportunities and make you more employable during slow economic times.

My advice to all cost estimators? Develop a habit of extracting as much data as you can from all projects that you do a cost estimate. You never know when you will need it? If you are looking for a great, up-to-date source of international cost data, in all industries, check this one out, Compass International Inc. I am not affiliated, therefore if you make a purchase I have no benefit. I recommend it because I use this resource and it was a life-saver over time.

I hope that you enjoyed this article. I would encourage anyone who has comments to do so. Questions and additions to the content are very valuable. I am writing articles to encourage discussion which will lead to sharing the knowledge. And, for those at the beginning at their career as a cost estimator, or those contemplating one, this types of articles are helpful. Do you agree?

Please do not forget to share!

Leave a Reply